Constitution doesn’t bar naturalized citizens from engaging in politics
Sujit Mainali / November 14, 2016
Abhishek Pratap Shah, a parliamentarian representing the Federal Socialist Forum, Nepal in an article titled “International practices regarding naturalized citizenship should be followed” published in Naya Patrika on November 7 states the following:
“Although there is a provision to grant a foreigner woman, who is married to a Nepali man, naturalized citizenship through matrimony immediately after she gives up her citizenship, the provision barring her from engaging in politics is unfair.”
South Asia Check has examined whether the constitution of Nepal bars women with matrimonial naturalized citizenship from participating in politics or not.
Article 289 (1) of the Constitution of Nepal-2015 indeed bars individuals with naturalized citizenship from being elected, nominated or appointed to the posts of president, vice-president, prime minister, chief justice, speaker of parliament, chairperson of the national assembly, head of province, chief minister, speaker of provincial assembly and chief of security bodies.
But the constitution does not bar them from engaging in politics and assuming political positions other than the aforementioned ones.
Similarly the constitution has set some conditions for the individuals with naturalized citizenship or those with citizenship by birth to be eligible for other posts of the constitutional bodies.
Article 289 (2) of the constitution has mentioned that to be eligible for other posts of the constitutional bodies, a candidate with naturalized citizenship must have lived in Nepal for at least ten years. But those with citizenship by birth or women with matrimonial naturalized citizenship are qualified for the other positions in constitutional bodies if they have lived in Nepal for at least five years.
Therefore, parliamentarian Shah’s claim is wrong.
This material is copyrighted but may be used for any purpose by giving due credit to southasiacheck.org.
- In Public Interest What had been agreed with Dr KC and what is in the bill?
- Fact Check Minister falsely claims credit for Mahendra Highway widening work
- In Public Interest PM’s invitation for river trip to Calcutta premature
- Earthquake Promise Tracker Half of quake-destroyed schools rebuilt
- Fact Check NAC Managing Director Kansakar lies on camera
- Fact Check Nepali Congress was not the first party to demand federalism
In Public InterestWhat had been agreed with Dr KC and what is in the bill? What was in the July 26 agreement between Dr Govinda KC and the government? What is in the Medical E... Read More
- PM’s invitation for river trip to Calcutta premature
- NARC grappling with manpower shortage
- Dr Govinda KC’s demands and achievements
- Rape complaints doubled in six years: Police data
- Pesticides tests of fruits and vegetables, problems galore