Elderly allowance at 65 won’t benefit senior citizens from districts with lowest life expectancy and Dalits
Sujit Mainali / February 23, 2018
Lower life expectancy may not necessarily mean fewer elderly people
The immediate past government led by Nepali Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba in January decided to reduce the age bar for elderly allowance to 65 from 70 years. Many criticized the decision as impractical. In defense of his decision, Deuba during his last address to the nation as prime minister on February 15 said the following:
“Life expectancy in more than 50 districts of Nepal is below 70 years. In this context, the state has decided to reduce the age bar for elderly allowance to 65 out of respect to the elderly and to help them with their livelihoods.”
Many Nepali Congress leaders are defending the decision saying that life expectancy in many districts is below 70 and many people from such districts will benefit from the decision.
It may be noted that four of the five districts with lowest life expectancy are in the Karnali zone. But in the Karnali zone, people aged 60 years and above have already been receiving elderly allowance, long before the Deuba government’s decision to reduce the age to 65.
Nepal’s Dalit community has the lowest life expectancy (67.19 years) among all communities. And just like the residents of the Karnali zone, the Dalits of 60 years and above across the country have been receiving the elderly allowance.
‘Social Security Program Implementation Guidelines, 2072’ has defined the ‘senior citizen’ as a Nepali national aged 60 or above if he/she is a Dalit or resides within the Karnali zone, and aged 70 if he/she is non-Dalit and lives elsewhere.
Therefore, the decision of the Deuba-led government does not benefit the senior citizens from four of the five districts with lowest life expectancy, and the Dalit community.
The aforementioned decision appears to be the result of a general belief that the number of senior citizens in districts with higher life expectancy is higher and vice versa. But a study of relevant data by South Asia Check found that there may not necessarily be a correlation between life expectancy and the number of elderly.
For example, Saptari, Siraha and Rauthat are the second, third and fifth districts of Nepal with highest life expectancy. But the percentage of elderly (people of 70 and above) in these districts is less than the percentage of the elderly in five districts (Bajura, Pyuthan, Manang, Mustang and Bajhang) with lowest life expectancy (except for the districts in Karnali zone). The percentages of elderly in Saptari and Mustang districts are 2.74 and 4.74 respectively.
This material is copyrighted but may be used for any purpose by giving due credit to southasiacheck.org.
- Fact Check Rajendra Shrestha partially correct about communist party’s 1954 document
- Fact Check Mahato misreads constitutional provisions on altering provincial boundaries
- Media Quarterly report (Jan-Mar) on anonymous sources in newspapers
- Fact Check Govt’s 2016 energy document can’t be solely credited for reduction in load-shedding
- Fact Check How correct are Congress spokesman’s claims about white paper?
- In Public Interest There was a time when rice was Nepal’s major export item
In Public InterestThere was a time when rice was Nepal’s major export item Several news reports and articles published in Gorkhapatra between 1974 and 1975 said the agricultur... Read More
- Communities that have been able to make it to parliament without reservation
- Birth date mismatch problem isn’t going away soon
- Few women elected to parliament under FPTP
- Six women elected to parliament under FPTP system
- Tall poll promises!