Is provincial consent mandatory in US and India for altering provincial boundaries?
Sujit Mainali / March 3, 2017
Naya Shakti Nepal coordinator and former prime minister Baburam Bhattarai said the following during an interview in the ‘Power Views’ program aired on Avenues TV on February 26:
“If the state [country] or its people want to change the number of provinces, then they should be allowed to do so. But we have a constitution that requires approval of both the central and provincial parliaments for making such change. Due to this provision, changing the number of provinces is possible only in theory, but not in practice.”
Bhattarai favors giving federal parliament the final authority to make changes to the number of provinces and views the existing provision requiring approval of the provincial assembly to make such changes as impractical.
What does Nepal’s constitution say?
Article 274 of the Constitution of Nepal-2015 says that the constitution amendment bill can be endorsed by the two-thirds majorities of the existing members in the both houses of the federal assembly.
But clause 4 and 5 of Article 274 mention that if an amendment bill is about provincial boundaries, the bill should also be endorsed by the majority of the provincial assemblies concerned.
What is the practice elsewhere?
South Asia Check has looked at practice in other counties to see whether the federal parliament can solely decide to alter the provincial boundaries or the number of provinces. For this, we studied the constitutions of India and the US.
Article 3 of the India’s Constitution has provisions regarding altering the provincial boundaries. This article has accorded ultimate rights on the federal parliament to form a new state [province] by separation of territory from any state or by uniting two or more states or parts of states or by uniting any territory to a part of any state. Similarly, the federal assembly is also empowered to alter the boundaries of provinces and change their names.
According to the constitution, views of the concerned states should be sought on the amendment bill meant for altering its boundary. But still, the views of the state assemblies are not binding on the federal assembly.
Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the US Constitution has provisions regarding making change on the numbers and boundaries of the states. It allows the US Congress (federal parliament) to admit new states into the union. But the Congress solely cannot form or erect new states within the jurisdiction of any other state, nor can it form any state by merging two or more states or parts of states. For this, consent of the legislature of the concerned states concerned is mandatory.
This material is copyrighted but may be used for any purpose by giving due credit to southasiacheck.org.
- Fact Check Dahal had not helped Madhav Nepal become prime minister
- Fact Check Govt’s policy and program made wrong claim about Raxaul-Amlekhgunj petroleum pipeline
- In Public Interest Nepal has no technology to test alleged use of oxytocin in fruits and vegetables
- Media Quarterly report (Jan-March 2019 on anonymous sources in newspapers
- Media Quarterly report (October-December 2018) on anonymous sources in newspapers
- Fact Check Opinion article has errors in figures
In Public InterestNepal has no technology to test alleged use of oxytocin in fruits and vegetables There have not been reliable scientific studies on the use of oxytocin in vegetable and fruits, in b... Read More
- Nepal is among 25 countries that deny women right to pass on citizenship to children independently
- Inland waterways: Are Nepali waters navigable?
- What had been agreed with Dr KC and what is in the bill?
- PM’s invitation for river trip to Calcutta premature
- NARC grappling with manpower shortage