Is provincial consent mandatory in US and India for altering provincial boundaries?
Sujit Mainali / March 3, 2017
Naya Shakti Nepal coordinator and former prime minister Baburam Bhattarai said the following during an interview in the ‘Power Views’ program aired on Avenues TV on February 26:
“If the state [country] or its people want to change the number of provinces, then they should be allowed to do so. But we have a constitution that requires approval of both the central and provincial parliaments for making such change. Due to this provision, changing the number of provinces is possible only in theory, but not in practice.”
Bhattarai favors giving federal parliament the final authority to make changes to the number of provinces and views the existing provision requiring approval of the provincial assembly to make such changes as impractical.
What does Nepal’s constitution say?
Article 274 of the Constitution of Nepal-2015 says that the constitution amendment bill can be endorsed by the two-thirds majorities of the existing members in the both houses of the federal assembly.
But clause 4 and 5 of Article 274 mention that if an amendment bill is about provincial boundaries, the bill should also be endorsed by the majority of the provincial assemblies concerned.
What is the practice elsewhere?
South Asia Check has looked at practice in other counties to see whether the federal parliament can solely decide to alter the provincial boundaries or the number of provinces. For this, we studied the constitutions of India and the US.
Article 3 of the India’s Constitution has provisions regarding altering the provincial boundaries. This article has accorded ultimate rights on the federal parliament to form a new state [province] by separation of territory from any state or by uniting two or more states or parts of states or by uniting any territory to a part of any state. Similarly, the federal assembly is also empowered to alter the boundaries of provinces and change their names.
According to the constitution, views of the concerned states should be sought on the amendment bill meant for altering its boundary. But still, the views of the state assemblies are not binding on the federal assembly.
Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the US Constitution has provisions regarding making change on the numbers and boundaries of the states. It allows the US Congress (federal parliament) to admit new states into the union. But the Congress solely cannot form or erect new states within the jurisdiction of any other state, nor can it form any state by merging two or more states or parts of states. For this, consent of the legislature of the concerned states concerned is mandatory.
This material is copyrighted but may be used for any purpose by giving due credit to southasiacheck.org.
- Fact Check Rajendra Shrestha partially correct about communist party’s 1954 document
- Fact Check Mahato misreads constitutional provisions on altering provincial boundaries
- Media Quarterly report (Jan-Mar) on anonymous sources in newspapers
- Fact Check Govt’s 2016 energy document can’t be solely credited for reduction in load-shedding
- Fact Check How correct are Congress spokesman’s claims about white paper?
- In Public Interest There was a time when rice was Nepal’s major export item
In Public InterestThere was a time when rice was Nepal’s major export item Several news reports and articles published in Gorkhapatra between 1974 and 1975 said the agricultur... Read More
- Communities that have been able to make it to parliament without reservation
- Birth date mismatch problem isn’t going away soon
- Few women elected to parliament under FPTP
- Six women elected to parliament under FPTP system
- Tall poll promises!