Dahal had not helped Madhav Nepal become prime minister
South Asia Check / May 22, 2019
Gyanendra Acharya/South Asia Check
At a function organized by the Youth Association Nepal on May 15, Nepal Communist Party Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal, the erstwhile chief of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Center), claimed that he had helped the then CPN-UML leaders, one after another, to become prime ministers. Addressing the function, Dahal exclaimed to the audience, “What do you think of me? Do you see me as an unstable person or an unusual individual who makes prime ministers of UML leaders one after another?”
Dahal went on to claim that he had supported the then CPN-UML leader Jhalanath Khanal to become prime minister. “Comrade Jhalanath Khanal was the chairman of another political party. But I was the chief of the country’s largest political party and I realized that it would be in the national interest if CPN-UML’s Jhalanath Khanal was made prime minister.”
South Asia Check has tried to examine whether Dahal’s claim is correct or not.
After Dahal’s resignation as prime minister, CPN-UML leader Madhav Kumar Nepal was elected the new prime minister from parliament. But Dahal’s party, the CPN (Maoist Center) had boycotted the election. Addressing the parliament a day before Nepal was elected prime minister, Dahal had said, “Our party condemns this sham process of government formation and will continue to peacefully challenge the move in both the parliament and the street until the president’s unconstitutional order is withdrawn and civilian supremacy restored.”
The full text of Dahal’s address to the parliament was published in Gorkhapatra dated May 23, 2009.
In fact, Dahal had expressed his dissatisfaction even after Nepal was elected prime minister. In a news report titled “I tried to grow ambrosia, but it seems to be growing into a poison tree” published in Gorkhapatra on May 25, 2009 Dahal has been quoted as saying, “With good intentions the Maoist party helped him [Nepal] become a member of the Constituent Assembly, but now we feel betrayed.”
This shows Dahal’s claim that he helped CPN-UML leaders become prime minister is wrong in Madhav Nepal’s case.
Following Madhav Kumar Nepal’s resignation as prime minister on June 30, 2010, new election was held in parliament to pick a new prime minister. In the election, Dahal himself was a candidate alongside CPN-UML chief Jhalanath Khanal and Nepali Congress leader Ram Chandra Paudel.
In the first round of election held on July 21, 2010, none of the candidates was able to secure majority to become prime minister. Jhalanath Khanal withdrew his candidacy from the second round and his party, the CPN-UML, decided to remain neutral in the election. But Dahal continued to contest the elections until the seventh round without success and withdrew from the eighth round on September 26, 2010 and his party, the CPN (Maoist Center), also decided to remain neutral. Now Nepali Congress leader Paudel was the only candidate, but with the Maoist Center and the CPN-UML keeping away, he could not secure majority votes although the election protracted to 17 rounds. Until the 18th round of election, when the constituent assembly ordered that all members must participate in the election, Dahal had been adamant on his stance that an all-party government should be formed under the leadership of his party, the Maoist Center.
A Kantipur report headlined “Consensus government only under Maoist leadership” published on January 26, 2011 said: “Maoist Center Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal has said that a consensus government is possible only under the leadership of his party, the Maoist Center. And if this is not possible, then a consensus government should be formed under a pro-national independence leader or a politically neutral individual.”
“A consensus government is possible only under Maoist leadership,” the report quoted Dahal as saying to reporters at his residence in Nayabazar, adding, “Since the Maoist Center is the largest party in the Constituent Assembly, a key party to the peace process and advocate for Constituent Assembly, only under its leadership that a consensus government is possible.”
But in the 18th round of the election for prime minister on February 3, 2011, in which both Dahal and Khanal, and Ram Chandra Paudel were candidates, Dahal withdrew from the race and supported Khanal.
Although Dahal’s claim that Khanal became prime minister with his support is correct, in making the claim he sounded like he had supported Khanal from the very beginning of the election and this is incorrect.
Therefore, Dahal’s claim that he had supported CPN-UML leaders to become prime ministers one after another is partially correct.
This material is copyrighted but may be used for any purpose by giving due credit to southasiacheck.org.
- Fact Check PM’s foreign affairs advisor repeats an already debunked claim
- Fact Check Finance minister makes unreliable claims about Nepali printing industry
- Fact Check Neither Tilicho nor the new lake are highest in Nepal or world
- Media Quarterly report (April-June 2019) on anonymous sources in newspapers
- Fact Check Kathmandu PM levels show PM’s air quality claim baseless
- Fact Check Dahal had not helped Madhav Nepal become prime minister
In Public InterestNepal has no technology to test alleged use of oxytocin in fruits and vegetables There have not been reliable scientific studies on the use of oxytocin in vegetable and fruits, in b... Read More
- Nepal is among 25 countries that deny women right to pass on citizenship to children independently
- Inland waterways: Are Nepali waters navigable?
- What had been agreed with Dr KC and what is in the bill?
- PM’s invitation for river trip to Calcutta premature
- NARC grappling with manpower shortage