Approval of unaffected provinces is not needed for altering provincial boundaries
Sujit Mainali / May 9, 2017
Nepali Congress central committee member Dr Shekhar Koirala in an article titled “Formula for solution: Consensus government” published in Naya Patrika daily on April 30, said the following:
“Of course, a new province can be carved out of Province 5. But how reasonable would it be to seek permission from Province 1 for carving a new province out of Province 5?”
South Asia Check has examined whether the permission of Province 1 is required to alter the boundary of Province 5 or not.
For this, we studied the provisions of the Constitution of Nepal-2072 regarding making changes to the provincial boundaries.
Clause 5 and 7 of Article 274 of the constitution state that the amendment bill meant for altering the boundary of a province(s) should be endorsed by simple majority of the provincial assemblies concerned.
Agitating Madhes-based parties are demanding parliamentary endorsement of the provisions on altering the provincial boundaries mentioned in the first amendment bill brought by the incumbent Pushpa Kamal Dahal-led government.
Dr Koirala has mentioned the same amendment bill [which has already been withdrawn by the government] in his article.
If the provincial boundaries are altered as per the first amendment bill, then the boundaries of Province 4, Province 5 and Province 6 will change.
If the provincial assemblies of two out of the three provinces concerned accept the bill through simple majority, the federal parliament can endorse the bill through its two-thirds majority.
None of the provisions of the constitution makes it mandatory to seek the permission of Province 1 to alter the boundaries of Province 5.
Therefore, Dr Koirala’s statement is wrong.
This material is copyrighted but may be used for any purpose by giving due credit to southasiacheck.org.
- Fact Check PM wrongly claims credit for no cold wave deaths
- In Public Interest What had been agreed with Dr KC and what is in the bill?
- Fact Check Minister falsely claims credit for Mahendra Highway widening work
- In Public Interest PM’s invitation for river trip to Calcutta premature
- Promise Tracker Half of quake-destroyed schools rebuilt
- Fact Check NAC Managing Director Kansakar lies on camera
In Public InterestWhat had been agreed with Dr KC and what is in the bill? What was in the July 26 agreement between Dr Govinda KC and the government? What is in the Medical E... Read More
- PM’s invitation for river trip to Calcutta premature
- NARC grappling with manpower shortage
- Dr Govinda KC’s demands and achievements
- Rape complaints doubled in six years: Police data
- Pesticides tests of fruits and vegetables, problems galore